• 专利附录
  • 专利说明
  • 权利要求
  • 类似技术
  • 同族专利
  • 引用文献
  • 法律状态
  • 优先权
    • 专利摘要:
    abstract of the disclosure a system and method for confirming that emergency resources are available to be used at a particular location, communicating to the incident manager at that location and estimated time of arrival of the resource, and tracking the resource during transit to the location for updating the estimated time of arrival. translation of the patent abstract summary of invention: "communication system and resource tracking". it is a system and method for confirming that emergency resources are available to be used in a particular location, for communicating to the incident manager about the location and estimated time of arrival of the resource and for tracking the feature during transit to update the estimated arrival time.
    公开号:BR112014001234B1
    申请号:R112014001234-2
    申请日:2012-07-18
    公开日:2020-03-31
    发明作者:James Patrick Messerly
    申请人:James Patrick Messerly；
    IPC主号:
    专利说明:

    Invention Patent Descriptive Report for METHOD FOR A CENTRAL PART DIRECT A MOBILE RESOURCE EQUIPMENT.
    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION [001] The invention relates to emergency response systems, emergency equipment and emergency equipment tracking, and to communication devices and processes used to respond to emergencies.
    [002] The government has long held the responsibility to respond quickly to geographically diverse public emergencies. This need to coordinate the dispatch of resource files is intended to save lives, reduce losses and prevent any other loss of property. Although the elements of natural disasters, traffic collisions and terrorism are quite diverse, the solutions to respond efficiently to them are strikingly similar. The early arrival of emergency resources at an emergency site is the best way to respond to any emergency. Therefore, it is indisputable that given the equal response rates and the same paths to the incident site, the resource geographically closest to any site will arrive first and the situation resolution phase will begin.
    [003] In an effort to meet the demands of managing a mobile society, the evolution of motorized travel is just one example that portrays the nascent resource management responsibility for dealing with emergencies. The government's responsibility to respond to motor vehicle emergencies must have started with the first motor vehicle fatality, which occurred when an Irish scientist was hit by a steam car in 1869. Undoubtedly, aid must have been triggered in a way
    Petition 870190110696, of 29/10/2019, p. 9/43
    2/28 too primitive for that first tragedy. Many years and safety innovations later, the global economic cost of motor vehicle crashes rose to an estimated $ 518 billion a year in 2003, with $ 100 billion of these occurring in developing countries. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that the United States cost in 2000 was $ 230 billion. In 2003, the Oakridge National Laboratory and the University of Tennessee completed a study that reveals that $ 99 billion is lost each year in workers' hours due to specific congestion situations on the nation's highways. This congestion was related to slow traffic due to incidents that blocked lanes, many of which required a tow truck to release damaged or invalid vehicles. Although communication devices have been developed to call for assistance, the process of selecting and providing adequate resources is still in its early stages. With extensive transportation experience, one can expect to witness the loss of life and property resulting from inadequate methods used to provide emergency assistance. In July 2008, the Department of Homeland Security, through the National Emergency Communications Plan, indicated the vital need to improve emergency communications for the nation's Federal, State, local and tribal emergency teams. These goals included the development of protocols to effectively use its resources and personnel with emerging technologies that integrate current emergency communication and improve response capabilities.
    [004] During a 30-year career with the Arizona highway patrol, the Depositor had the opportunity to
    IBeiÇãto887ni19M111IffiB95, die32911B2H1199, nájg. 1604®
    3/28 witness the need for an expeditious response of resources to public emergencies. The Depositor handled a wide range of events, from individual accidents to major planned events, such as national emergency training. In thousands of incidents, the Depositor has experienced the inefficiencies of the current resource management system with which auxiliary resources for government emergencies are selected and implemented. While serving as a Department of Public Security with representation at the Arizona State Emergency Operations Center, the Depositor has developed a sense of the importance of emergency response at all levels. For decades, the technology available only allowed telephone and radio communication and the selection of potential resources available through a simple rotation system. The rotation system had no guarantee that resources were coordinated by their proximity to the emergency. During the last national emergency training, coordinated by FEMA in 2007 named TOPOFF 4, The Depositor was one of the planners for the portion of the terrorism scenario that took place in Phoenix. The focal point was the police's initial response and its coordination of auxiliary resources. Many features were still selected by a simple rotation method that uses an availability list without considering the immediate proximity to the simulated terrorist attack. In order to build such a list, contractors who wish to be available to provide services contact the authorities and ask for their name to be included in the list. When the need arises, the list is consulted and the next party on the list who will provide these services is contacted. If your services are used, their names are removed and they are not contacted until the next rotation. This rotation method has been adopted for a period of years to ensure an equitable distribution of service calls
    Iiatçã «n887f1 W (111 (61« .ά1ι. Β2ί / 11022 (1 ro.fpijg. 11 // 8B
    4/28 between towing companies, without considering finding the available truck closest to the incident. This method does not provide the quickest release for events that produce congestion, and this results in collateral accidents. For example, the United States Department of Transportation (US Department of Transportation) estimates that for every minute that delays the opening of a lane closure on a road, the likelihood of a secondary car accident increases by approximately 2.8% . It is apparent that these limited technologies have prevented other resource managers.
    [005] Many federal agencies, including FEMA and the
    Department of National Security (DHS) has placed communication and rapid coordination of emergency auxiliary resources as a top priority. The FEMA Response Directory requires the disaster response capacity needed to save and maintain lives, minimize suffering and protect property in a timely and effective manner in communities that are destroyed by natural disasters, acts of terrorism or other emergencies.
    [006] FEMA's priorities were reflected by the
    Federal Road Administration in 2010 when it adopted specific goals and strategies related to emergency resource management. These were proposed by the National Traffic Incident Management Coalition (NTIMC) and formed what became known as the Unified National Goal. NTIMC Goals are to respond with security; safe and quick release; and immediate, reliable and interoperable communications. NTIMC claims that it will achieve these goals through 18 strategies, including a commitment to setting goals for responding to the traffic incident and release times, and for working
    IBeiÇãto887ni19ffl.11IffiB95, die32911B2H1199, nájg. 182412
    5/28 set for rapid and coordinated implementation of beneficial new technologies for traffic incident management. [007] The National Traffic Safety Administration in
    Estrada (NHTSA) has long recognized that the four E's for road safety are Engineering, Education, Application and Emergency Response. In September 2010, the Depositor conducted a national survey to determine which protocol state road patrols in each state employed to request resources to respond to events that create highway congestion. The results indicated that 90% of states simply used a rotation list to call for assistance to release blocking vehicles. The rest of the states used a single supply system based on one company that won the contract for all trailers, with the exception of one state that allowed shock troops selected without trailer suppliers according to individual preference.
    [008] [009] It was through the results of this research that the
    Depositor confirmed the national scope and importance of its effort to reduce the amount of time required for emergency response resources to reach emergency sites. Failure to provide the fastest emergency response affects all government responses to an emergency civilian or third party emergency response resources are called upon to assist. DHS, FEMA and countless state / local agencies hire civilian resources to resolve emergencies under government responsibility. For example, DHS relies on state policy to quickly remove vehicles that block an evacuation route during a terror attack. FEMA's actions require the response of civilian equipment contracted to reinforce floodplain dikes. The timing of the essence and the guarantee and confirmation that
    IBeiÇãto887ni19H111IffiB95, die3291IB2H1] 99, nájg. 19 / 8B
    6/28 requested resources are on the way is essential. Therefore, there is a need for a better communication system between emergency response resources and the person at the scene of an emergency who manages all resources and there is a need for confirmation that the nearest resources are on their way to the scene. BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION [009] The following definitions are used in this document:
    [0010] CAD - Computer Aided Dispatch.
    [0011] ETA - Time of 5 Arrival Estimated.
    [0012] GPS - Global Positioning Satellite or any available redundant system that determines location, including, without limitation, radio signal or cell phone signal triangulation methods and verbal testimonials of location.
    [0013] IM - Incident manager, who is a person at the scene of an emergency who manages the flow of resources on the site facing the emergency.
    [0014] RMC - Resource Management Centers, which are also referred to in this document as the Central Party, or CP.
    [0015] RFID - Radio frequency identification or any equivalent proximity censoring technology, including, without limitation, Near Field Communication (NFC), Bluetooth and Wi-Fi. [0016] SLR - Linked System Resources, which are equipment operators emergency resources combined with the equipment itself, whose response to an incident is coordinated through that system.
    [0017] SLR- Category A - SLRs that have an agreement established with an RMC to respond daily using cellular devices capable of RFID or equivalent technology.
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/30/2019, p. 14/93
    7/28 [0018] SLR- Category B - SLRs that have an agreement established with an RMC to respond on a basis intermittently using cellular devices capable of RFID or equivalent technology.
    [0019] SLR- Category C - SLRs without agreements established to respond and that do not have cellular devices capable of RFID or equivalent technology. These features include those that the RMC determines are necessary to respond to unique situations and are not linked to the system in the same way as an SLR A or B is. This includes features that were initiated by parties outside the RMC protocol.
    [0020] The method and the system allow an IM to request and confirm the ETA of all third party resources. This method and resource management system confirms that requested SLR's are on their way using the integration of GPS-based mobile devices that are linked to mobile resources. Through the system, third-party resources confirmed as being closest to the emergency site are sent to the site and are tracked in real time so that the ETA status is confirmed for the IM. The link between the SLR operator and the equipment confirms and ensures that resource operators are available and respond with the requested resource equipment. This is accomplished through a device computer program that recognizes the appropriate resource equipment using an RFID, barcode or other unique identifier.
    [0021] In general, the system includes communication equipment, such as a radio or cell phone, which is used by the incident manager (IM) to communicate with a Central Party (CP), such as a dispatcher. The location of the incident is commonly communicated first to the CP using the communication device, such as
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/39/2019, p. 11/93
    8/28 by speaking on a radio or cell phone. Typically, although the steps are not required to be performed in the order described in this document, the need for emergency resource equipment will then be determined by the IM and then this need is communicated to the CP afterwards.
    [0022] After the need for emergency equipment has been communicated to CP, CP determines the location of the nearest SLR and then contacts the SLR operator, such as a tow truck operator, backhoe operator, operator excavator or any other SLR operator, and communicates the need and location to the SLR operator. The SLR operator can confirm that resource equipment is available, but, more importantly, confirm to CP that the equipment is in close proximity to the SLR operator.
    [0023] This confirmation can be performed by one or more confirmation technologies, including the SLR operator who has the location tracking device (such as his cell phone) in close proximity to an RFID device on the resource equipment (such as in a tow truck or backhoe), or by any other means by which the owner / operator's location can confirm close proximity to SLR equipment, including near field communication (NFC) technology.
    [0024] This is the confirmation step that critically prevents optimistic or fraudulent SLR operators from telling CP that they are close to your appeal when they are not. The possible negative impact on the realization of the IM that any plan if the ETA of the SLR operator is incorrect, cannot be overstated. The SLR operator then begins to travel to the incident site with the resource while its location is continuously or periodically tracked and continuously or periodically communicates to the CP and / or IM. Thus, ETA
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 12/43
    9/28 and location of the SLR may be known to the IM for the purpose of planning the realization of response to the incident.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS [0025] Figure 1 is a schematic illustration showing three spaced parts using one embodiment of the invention.
    [0026] In describing the preferred embodiment of the invention, which is illustrated in the drawings, specific terminology will be referred to for the sake of clarity. However, it is not intended that the invention be limited to the specific term selected and it should be understood that each specific term includes all technical equivalents which operate in a similar manner to achieve a similar purpose. For example, the connected word or terms similar to it are often used. They are not limited to direct connection, but include connection through other elements, where such connection is recognized as being equivalent by those skilled in the art. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION [0027] Provisional Patent Application No. US61 / 508,761 filed on July 18, 2011 is hereby incorporated by reference.
    [0028] The general embodiment of the invention includes communication devices, such as radios, cell phones and any other devices that are capable of bidirectional communication with another person. Such communication can be by one person speaking on the device and the other person listening to the sound played on the other device, or by speaking and the device using speech recognition software to transmit an electronic message. Alternatively, communications can be by sending electronic messages, such as e-mail or text message. Clearly, any other two-way communications between humans and computers is contemplated. The preferential system includes
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/39/2019, p. 17/41
    10/28 the SLR operator who uses a so-called smart phone with computer capabilities and other technologies, such as GPS location tracker, the ability to install applications (apps) of various types, a digital camera and internet access.
    [0029] However, a variety of existing and future technologies could replace preferable devices, as will be apparent to a person of ordinary skill from the description in this document.
    [0030] The process commonly begins with the IM, who is usually one of the first people to arrive at the scene of the incident, who communicates with the CP using a radio transmission system from the police or fireman to carry out verbal communications to the CP. Clearly, IM could communicate with CP by talking on a cell phone, typing or speaking or (using voice recognition software) text messages, email or any other means of communication that can be readily transported to the scene emergency.
    [0031] The radio is typically in the vehicle or with the IM person, and, on arrival, the location of the incident is communicated verbally by IM to CP. The location of the IM, and thus the emergency site, can be communicated by manually or automatically connecting the CP equipment to the GPS or other means of detecting a location on the radio, cell phone, vehicle or IM person in order to locate the IM and therefore the emergency site.
    [0032] Clearly, the location can also be communicated by the IM simply by confirming arrival at the scene from a location to which the IM has been instructed to go, without expressly determining the location of the IM. The IM thus has a location that is determined by the CP so that the CP can send equipment based on the instructions and requirements of the IM
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 18/93
    11/28 [0033] Although the order of communicating information is not critical, the typical order of communicating is described below. After the IM communicates the location, the IM typically examines the situation on the scene and develops a plan to respond to the emergency. The IM then communicates to CP several issues, including, without limitation, the IM's need for third-party emergency resource equipment, such as a tow truck to move a wrecked automobile or an excavator to move debris from an overturn. . This need for third party resources is typically communicated to CP using the radio or other communication device the IM brings to the scene, as described above. Thus, this communication with the CP can be achieved in one or more of many ways, including, without limitation, speaking, sending a text message or sending e-mail. It will be apparent to the person of ordinary skill that communication can also occur via IM by filling out forms in an application installed on a cell phone or any other computer device that is electronically connected to the central system via Wi-Fi, virtual private network (VPN) , internet, cell phone system, etc.
    [0034] Once the CP has the location of the IM and requested resources, the CP then uses location-related data and other information available to the CP to determine the closest SLR available to the incident site that may meet the need of necessary resource equipment. In a preferred mode, the system includes one or more SLR operators that carry a communication device that can be geographically tracked, such as using conventional GPS equipment, and that indicates the types of equipment available to the SLR operator. In one example, all tow truck drivers have smart phones that run an application that communicates to a computer system.
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/39/2019, p. 19/41
    12/28 central the location of the smart phone and the availability of its tow trucks. It is contemplated, although not requested, that the communication device may indicate that the SLR operator is available or not available to receive requests from the CP. That way, when the SLR operator is not available (for example, he or she is already towing a vehicle), CP does not waste precious time trying to contact or waiting for a response from the SLR operator. In summary, when the system determines the available resource adjacent to the emergency site, the system will only consider available resources of the type requested by the IM.
    [0035] The determination of which available SLR operator will be contacted is preferably performed automatically by a central computer that has local IM data and the continuously tracked location of all SLR operators available in the vicinity of the emergency site. A simple geographic comparison, preferably based on normal mapping technology and ideally taking into account traffic, weather, construction and other variable conditions, determines which available SLR operator is closest. Such automatic computer comparison prevents individuals from making mistakes or favoring one SLR operator over another and is extremely fast and reliable. Clearly, the nearest available SLR operator can be determined manually by the CP by looking at a map showing all available resources close to the incident or a map that has been filtered to show only those resources for which the IM has expressed a need. The filtration that occurs can be performed manually or automatically. It is contemplated that the CP computer can receive the resource request electronically from the IM and,
    Petition 870190110696, of 29/10/2019, p. 26/93
    13/28 after receipt, automatically locates the available SLR operator closest to the incident.
    [0036] Once the nearest available SLR operator is determined, that SLR operator is contacted, preferably automatically by the system that sends a text or e-mail message. Clearly, the system could simply connect the SLR operator's cell phone to the CP's communication device or notify CP of the SLR operator's contact information and present CP with options to contact the SLR operator. In this case, CP can manually contact the SLR operator by phone, text message, e-mail or similar immediate communication. In general, it is the SLR operator's cell phone or other special-purpose communication device that is tracked by the CP system that allows the SLR operator's location to be tracked and contact with the SLR operator. It is assumed that, for the purposes of the system, that, unless the resource itself (which is a backhoe, boat, excavator, saw, etc.) is tracked separately, what is contemplated is the SLR operator that is tracked . The most convenient way currently contemplated to track the location of the SLR operator is by tracking the location of your cell phone or other device equipped with GPS. This also makes it convenient to contact the SLR operator in the next step. Although there may be other devices that can replace cell phone location tracking, it is the most viable known device for the Depositor at this time. Clearly, the person who has common skills will know from this description that new and varied devices can replace the cell phone described in this document.
    [0037] The SLR operator can be contacted in any way, including, without limitation, a cell phone call
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 27/93
    Conventional 14/28, sending text messages and sending conventional e-mail or a special purpose device. Regardless of how it occurs, the SLR operator is notified of the need for its resource, the location of the emergency site and the fact that it is an emergency to which the SLR operator must respond immediately. In general, all SLR operators A and B will have previously agreed to a series of rules, which include the requirement to accept all resource requirements when the equipment and operator are available. It is for this reason that it is preferable that the SLR operator is able to indicate availability to the system so that if the equipment is not available, time is not wasted when the SLR is not available to respond to a requirement. It is contemplated that SLR C operators have an option to accept the application, but it is also contemplated that any SLR that does not fulfill the requirements could be considered for elimination from the system due to lack of confidence.
    [0038] After being contacted, the SLR operator can respond by confirming that he or she can meet the requirement, or it can be assumed that the SLR operator will immediately begin transporting the equipment to the emergency site. It is contemplated that the SLR operator can respond that he or she cannot meet the requirement, but this is considered an exception to the general rule except for SLR C operators. The SLR can respond in any way permitted by the system, but speak, send message text and send e-mail, together with all equivalents, are contemplated. If a specialized electronic form is sent to the SLR via email or an application installed on the SLR operator's phone, the SLR operator can simply check the box or field on a form in response.
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/30/2019, p. 28/93
    15/28 [0039] Once the SLR operator receives the indication of the need for its resource and possibly responded (or some other indication was served according to the SLR operator's response), the SLR operator then confirms that the SLR operator is in close proximity to the resource equipment and can therefore meet the needs requested by CP and IM. This step is necessary because if the resource equipment that is desired by the IM is not in close proximity to the SLR operator, the SLR operator is unable to meet the need in the time anticipated by the CP and / or the CP computer. Therefore, if the resource is in the immediate presence of the SLR operator, he or she can quickly confirm this to the CP in one of the many acceptable ways, and then the IM can be given a reliable equipment ETA. If the resource is not in close proximity to the SLR operator, the SLR operator must travel to the location of the resource and confirm the location of the equipment to CP, preferably within a predetermined period of time that was previously agreed.
    [0040] Proximity confirmation can occur in one or more of the many forms, including, without limitation, in one of the many forms listed in this description, such as by having a detection device, such as a programmed smart phone, in close proximity to an RFID tag located on the device, by scanning a barcode or QR with a smart phone, by using NFC technology or by beeping a device on the device using Wi-Fi or Bluetooth technologies. As it happens, the SLR operator must confirm to CP the close proximity of the equipment in a reliable way to avoid any delays in arriving at the emergency site. Rapid arrival is clearly critical for responding to an emergency and therefore the IM must be able to rely on an accurate ETA. By confirming proximity
    Petition 870190110696, of 10/39/2019, p. 29/93
    16/28 to the resource, ETA is considered reliable.
    [0041] The confirmation that the SLR operator is close to the resource is contemplated to occur in one or more of the various ways.
    [0042] It is contemplated that an RFID identification can be physically attached to the resource, and the proximity of the SLR operator can be automatically confirmed by the CP using the SLR operator's smart phone that contains an application that detects the RFID and notifies the CP. This is achieved by using a mobile device with a function that allows the device to recognize and / or read an RFID that is preferably contained in a tag affixed to the resource equipment. Alternatively, after receiving notification of the need for the feature, the SLR operator manually triggers something on the smart phone that detects RFID or any other similar means of proximity detection. In addition, the smart phone can be manually placed in close proximity to a bar code, QR code or NFC device attached to the resource, which is then sent electronically to the CP to confirm proximity.
    [0043] Clearly, there are many other means and mechanisms that can be used to manually or automatically confirm the proximity of the SLR operator to the resource, which is necessary to prepare a reliable ETA.
    [0044] Once the proximity is confirmed and the CP is notified, the CP calculates an ETA on the emergency site for the SLR. It is contemplated that an ETA is prepared when the computer to which the CP has access is electronically notified of the confirmation and, then, the computer calculates an ETA automatically. This ETA is then sent to the IM manually or automatically to notify and / or approve. The IM is at least notified of the ETA and it is contemplated that the IM can
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 24/93
    17/28 respond to confirm receipt of the ETA, or the IM may require a resource that has an ETA adjacent to the current time. This may be necessary if the requested feature is not available, but a less preferred feature is available sooner. Thus, a plurality of SLR ETAs can be provided to the IM, which can then select the best option for the situation.
    [0045] After or while the SLR operator confirms the proximity to the equipment, the SLR operator transports the equipment to the emergency site. This is typically achieved by moving to the site via roads, but may include taking or otherwise transporting, without limitation, using a boat, an aircraft, or any other means of transport. It is preferred that the location of the SLR operator (and nearby resource equipment) is continuously tracked as it maps its way to the emergency site. It is also preferable to give IM the option of being notified of an updated ETA continuously (such as by a map display with a mobile SLR icon) or periodically (such as by radio messages audible periodically) because the ETA may change under conditions change. The IM can best respond to the emergency if he or she has periodic ETA updates.
    [0046] Once the resource equipment arrives at the scene and is under IM control, the arrival time is documented by the system, preferably by location tracking software. Documentation of the SLR location takes place for a short or long period of time after arrival, for example to determine how long the resource has been on the emergency site for payment purposes and for any other reasons. Tracking and documentation can take place for as long as the resource is on the emergency site or even later, if permission is given and privacy concerns are not raised. This can be
    Petition 870190110696, of 29/10/2019, p. 21/93
    18/28 for collection or any other reason that may or may not be known at the time.
    [0047] Thus, the operation of the system can be summarized in general to include the steps of the IM notifying the CP of the location and need for a particular resource, the CP obtaining the location of the nearest available SLR operator, the SLR operator confirming the close proximity to resource equipment, tracking the SLR on the way and possibly while on the emergency site, and reporting an ETA to the IM, possibly to include reporting an updated ETA while the SLR is on its way to the emergency site.
    [0048] The computer program for this system is preferably operated through a public server of national reach. Clearly, a private server can be used or parts of the public system can be kept private for reasons of privacy and / or security. This communication system is CAD compliant and is able to send and receive messages through the server of all organizations and rescuers involved.
    [0049] The system is designed with an open architecture to provide communication devices such as cell phones with the following additional accessory features: GPS accessory, message accessory, mapping accessory / router. The GPS requirements for this program allow the GPS location of sites across the country on any public road designated for or referred to by milestone signs, street address, road junction, road intersection, etc.
    [0050] The system preferably presents the CP with the place of
    Emergency site GPS and automatically selects the appropriate SLR to assist. A suitable SLR is defined as one that contains the appropriate equipment and the ability to handle a
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 23/93
    19/28 request by an IM. The individual location identifiers for each SLR A or B indicate the level of capacity, but are not available for SLR C. Examples follow from circumstances that are considered in some way typical of those encountered in emergency situations.
    [0051] Example 1. As shown in Figure 1, a highway patrol officer arrives at a site and acts as an IM as he requires a tow truck 12 for an accident at the junction of two roads. The system recognizes the GPS coordinates of the officer 10’s car and notifies the CP of the site’s location. This requested feature is introduced into the system by CP 14 using the graphical user interface that allows the selection of one or more of many pre-programmed feature options. After defining the location, the system searches and locates the available available tow rescuers adjacent and then presents the SLR operators in order of proximity to the incident. These rescuers have a pre-existing contract to have an operator ready to respond within minutes and are an SLR A for the highway patrol. The nearest SLR operator is contacted and operator SLR A confirms the proximity to the tow truck. After confirmation is entered into the system, an ETA is created by the system and the CP is notified of the same. The CP then communicates the ETA to the IM verbally using the radio and then the location of the SLR A is tracked by the system as SLR A travels to the site. Periodic ETA updates are announced over the radio by human or computerized statements to the IM by the system, thereby notifying the IM about the ETA of SLR A. The location of SLR A is confirmed to the point of the emergency site, and more later to confirm that the SLR A transported the towed vehicle to the location communicated to the system by the SLR A operator.
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 27/43
    20/28 [0052] Example 2. In the course of managing a landslide incident that compromised the availability of drinking water in a rural community, the IM government official uses a cell phone to request privately owned water trucks. your dispatcher CP. These resource vehicles have a pre-existing contract with the government to respond intermittently as needed. They are not normally on daily duty to the government, so there is no expectation that an operator is ready to respond in minutes. The operators of these vehicles are considered to be an SLR B and after arriving at the resource equipment, the operators confirm proximity using their smart phones to scan QR codes on the equipment and send this scanner to CP. The operators then travel to the emergency site. SLR B's are tracked as they travel to the site and ETA's for each SLR B are periodically communicated to the IM via the radio. SLR B's locations are also tracked later as they supply communities with water. The location information is maintained and used to confirm the information contained in the invoices sent by SLR B operators.
    [0053] Example 3. While managing a large HAZMAT spill in a mountainous area, IM decides that there is a need for locally owned tipper trucks to assist in placing material on the HAZMAT path by draining a ravine. These features are not operating under previous contractual agreements and are not equipped with cellular RFID devices and are therefore state SLR C rescuers. While their locations are not determined by RFID cellular devices, SLR C operators communicate their location current and proximity to your equipment to a CAD dispatcher at RMC
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 28/93
    21/28 while traveling to the incident. The dispatcher inserts this into the system that creates a GPS location for SLR C operators. Additional and updated locations while in transit for SLR C operators are determined as deemed necessary by the RMC. These actions will facilitate the tracking and determination of ETA's for an SLR C that responded.
    [0054] Once they arrive on the scene, the SLRC's are tracked to ensure that all my invoices were covered by the vehicles.
    [0055] A service of requesting messages through this system originates from an RMC and a centralized CAD system and is managed through a server capable of national coverage. All SLR operators are able to respond to a CAD message using cell-type devices that allow communication by text and verbal message. This provides the flow with specific or updated information in all directions between the IM, the SLR operators and the CP. The system transmits messages and uses GPS data (as described above). The system stores this information with the requested organization and each RMC. This includes the ability to track recordings and form statistical data.
    [0056] It should be noted that an SLR A or B will be selected only if its communication devices are activated and in the available mode. This available mode is an option that an SLR A or B operator selects in an application on the smart phone. This information is available when the operator's communication device accesses the program on the PLC. Thus, locating any SLR operator automatically or manually can be subordinate to the SLR operator that triggers a feature on the phone or other device.
    [0057] In a preferred mode, the program sends
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 29/43
    22/28 automatically a text message or other notification alarm to the nearest available SLR A or B operator when the SLR operator is identified as the one that can provide the fastest response time. This text message or other alarm includes the narrative information provided by the original dispatch call or a short description. Alternatively, a series of codes can be used to reduce the volume of communication. In addition, graphic photos or even photos or live videos can be sent to the SLR operator to advise on the need for the feature.
    [0058] SLR C rescuers are not included in the automated protocol and, therefore, it is contemplated that SLR C rescuers can communicate with the RMC using any cell phone technology that has call and text message features. [0059] It should also be noted that, although the description above refers mainly to government entities, such as CP and IM, the system of the invention can be used by a private company, family or any other entity that have a need for a system used to request resources, confirm proximity and report an ETA to the resource.
    [0060] Example 4. A freight forwarder in an RMC receives an application for five dump trucks in the middle required at a road construction site. The dispatcher inserts the complete application (location, necessary equipment, etc. in a short narrative form) into a CAD system that accesses a computer program that operates in conjunction with the inventive system. The program determines and assigns the GPS location to the site and immediately selects the trucks adjacent to the site based on their GPS locations of the tracked operators. The SLR operator of each truck confirms its proximity
    Petition 870190110696, of 29/10/2019, p. 26/93
    23/28 to the trucks and an ETA is sent to the IM notifying the ETA of the trucks.
    [0061] In the preferred mode, each operator that provides resources to remote sites has an application running on their phone and communicates with the system. It is preferred for the sake of efficiency that the application allows the selection of one or more common options instead of being asked to type a unique message each time a communication is needed. CP can access the Internet or a VPN to access the program from one or more phones of SLR operators. SLR operators A or B and CP communicate through this program with predetermined selections immediately.
    [0062] If an IM has a smart phone, then the IM can similarly use this tool. Otherwise, CP and IM communicate using a radio or other conventional verbal communication devices.
    [0063] The program thus offers options for message of a return message or cell phone call if there is a need for further clarification. This continues throughout the correspondence between the parties.
    [0064] Example 5. An emergency response group is dealing with a nuclear leak at a power plant that has suffered damage from an earthquake. A decision was made to require equipment that moves the land from a large metropolitan area 402 km (250 miles) away. These resources are not linked to the system like an SLRA or B and have no previous agreements to assist the government. They respond as a SLR C and will not automatically receive text messages or mapping via system protocols. They are, however, able to communicate with the system at a level that any
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 27/93
    24/28 cellular type device would even allow at least calls and text messages. When this communication is created, the resource is linked as an SLR C and operates within the system as described above.
    [0065] The preferred application includes the option of delivering a map message to the SLR operator (A, B or C) who responded, who delivers the IM and / or the CP an ETA to the SLR delivered in a graphical way showing the IM and the SLR on the way. The program is thus able to beep the SLR (A or B) which responded intermittently to receive updated locations and ETA's and deliver information about ETA's to IM and / or CP in various ways.
    [0066] Example 6. The RMC of the Department of Transportation of
    Texas uses a CAD program to require privately owned resources to respond to an overturned tanker. The RMC has determined that a heavy-duty destroyer (SLR A) and an environmental response company (SLR B) must respond. The application is routed through the server and the program assigns the GPS location to the incident and the nearest appropriate and available SLR operators. The text message or other alarm is sent to the nearest SLR operators who are in available mode and they respond that they are on their way.
    [0067] 24/27 [0068] The preferred program also automatically determines the most effective route for the incident and provides this information to SLR operators when communicating the resource requirement or at any time during communication with the SLR operator. SLR operators have the option of using this information or using their own route information. Regardless of the SLR operators' decisions regarding route information, the system will intermittently beep the SLR's for GPS locations and
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 38/93
    25/28
    Updated ETA's for the incident. This information will be routed to the Texas DOT RMC for response assessment purposes.
    [0069] Example 7. An RMC is using an SLR C (earth moving equipment) in response to the nuclear incident in the example above. When the SLR C operator does not have a mobile device that is formatted with the accessories of an SLR A or B, the operator can communicate with the RMC using any mobile device.
    [0070] The SLR C operator communicates his current location to a CAD dispatcher at RMC as he heads for the incident. The dispatcher then inserts this into the program that creates a GPS location for the SLR C. A routing text message is then sent to the RMC SLR operator and if the mobile device is capable, information mapping can also be forwarded by the RMC dispatcher. Any additional location information required for SLR C rescuers while in transit is determined as needed by the RMC. These actions facilitate any need for additional routing and ETA determinations for an SLR C that responded.
    [0071] As noted above, all location and time information is recorded and copied to the relevant RMC, in order to facilitate the integrity and evaluate the effectiveness of that system as applied to the circumstances for each RMC. The time of the following events can be recorded by the program as part of the responsibility portion of the program: the mobile device of the SLR operator receiving the service request from the RMC; the action message accepted from the mobile device of the SLR operator to the RMC and / or CP; the SLR operator's mobile device reads the RFID on the resource, thereby confirming that the SLR operator is in close proximity to the resource equipment.
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 39/93
    26/28 [0072] Example 8. An SLR A taxi operator receives a warning that a unit is needed in an urban area where resource vehicles (taxis) are on duty. Using the GPS technology connected to the system, the system immediately and automatically selects the adjacent available taxi to respond. The SLR A operator's response is timed to include notification that the application is accepted and the operator is in close proximity to the vehicle resource as verified by RFID under very limited time requirements. If the available SLR A operator receives a service request, but fails to respond by confirming the close proximity to that vehicle in a timely manner, such as within 60 or 120 seconds, that operator will not reach or maintain SLR A status. In this case, the operator can be canceled from the call (notification that it is sent to prevent multiple resources from reaching the scene) and the next supplier in the order of proximity to the call; and selected to respond. The program is designed to allow this as an automatic feature or to allow that feature to be performed manually. This feature can be selected for manual application in situations where there is a single source SLR A operator or the dispatcher RMC deems it necessary.
    [0073] Example 9. A specialized limo is requested to send an armed unit to Los Angeles Airport (LAX) for the arrival of a dignitary. The operator who responded has an extended ETA with the specialized feature because it must arrive at a secure garage where the bulletproof vehicle is stored. Limited time requirements are waived for the mobile device to be identified by RFID on the resource equipment. The resource response is timed from the operator's eventual arrival time on the equipment which is confirmed by RFID.
    Petition 870190110696, of 29/10/2019, p. 34/93
    27/28 [0074] It should be noted that the program allows for the comparison of a plurality of closest SLR A and B operators and to compare their ETA's with that of an SLR C operator. This allows them to be considered multiple resource providers to provide resources on the site. Thus, an IM can determine whether an SLR A furthest from a site should be selected in spite of a closer SLR B.
    [0075] Example 10. The RMC dispatcher is advised that an individual has called similar resources to remedy a situation before the RMC generated his application. That resource was not originally coordinated through the RMC, but is currently underway. Since this feature is not an SLR A or B, it becomes an SLR C. Once a location is entered into the system by the dispatcher in the RMC, a GPS location is assigned to the SLR C by the program.
    [0076] This ETA will be compared to the ETA previously established for SLR A or B. This will allow the government organization to make a decision on the cancellation of your appeal.
    [0077] Example 11. The invention is useful for responding to terrorist acts and avoiding further harm during the response to them. For example, a bombing is reported in the downtown area of a city of millions of citizens. There is a need to view the highways that leave the city for any suspicious vehicles, and therefore DHS wants all aircraft, including police, commercial and private aircraft, to be used to monitor outgoing traffic. All such aircraft are located using radar or other technology and are contacted using standard radio technology or cell phones, if available, and aircraft operators confirm their location in relation to the aircraft
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 31/93
    28/28 through verbal communication. As each aircraft is guided by the DHS authority (which acts as the IM in police headquarters with access to traffic cameras) for that particular region to monitor, each aircraft is tracked and ETA's for their particular regions are reported to the IM. Upon reaching the targeted region, each aircraft continues to be tracked for a variety of purposes, including, without limitation, to location while reporting any suspicious activity. Thus, the location of the emergency site is the respective region of the city to which each aircraft operator is instructed to transport the aircraft.
    [0078] This detailed description in connection with the drawings is primarily intended to be a description of the current preferred embodiments of the invention and is not intended to represent the only way in which the present invention can be built or used. The description establishes the projects, functions, means and methods of implementing the invention in connection with the illustrated modalities. It should be understood, however, that the same functions and characteristics or equivalents can be obtained by different modalities that are also intended to be encompassed within the spirit and scope of the invention and that several modifications can be adopted without departing from the invention or the scope of the following claims.
    权利要求:
    Claims (16)
    [1]
    1. Method for a central party (14) to direct mobile resource equipment, which is not a two-way communication device, to an emergency site after being notified by an incident manager of a need on the emergency site for the equipment mobile resource, the method characterized by the fact that it comprises:
    (a) the central part (14) obtains the location of the emergency site and locations of a plurality of resource operators, and identifies at least one resource operator who can provide the mobile resource equipment at the emergency site based, at least in part, in a comparison of the location of the said plurality of resource operators relative to the location of the emergency site;
    (b) the central part (14) communicates with a portable communication device, which said at least one resource operator carries with it;
    (c) after the central part (14) has communicated with the portable communication device, then said at least one resource operator confirms that the mobile resource equipment is in proximity to said at least one resource operator based, at least at least in part, at the resource operator step, positioning the mobile communication device close enough to the mobile resource equipment for the portable communication device to detect a unique identifier means coupled to the mobile resource equipment;
    (d) after said at least one resource operator has confirmed that the mobile resource equipment is in close proximity to said resource operator, then the portable communication device communicates to the central part (14) that the resource equipment
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 37/43
    [2]
    2/5 mobile is in the proximity of said at least one resource operator based, at least in part, on the detection by the mobile communication device of the unique identifier means coupled to the mobile resource equipment;
    (e) said at least one resource operator resource carries the mobile resource equipment towards the emergency site;
    (f) the central party (14) communicates with the incident manager an estimated time of arrival at an emergency site of said at least one resource operator and the mobile resource equipment based, at least in part, on tracking the movement of said portable communication device towards the emergency site; and (g) where the step of confirming still comprises placing the portable communication device in a proximity close enough to detect optically information in the middle of a unique identifier, which is an optically readable code.
    2. Method according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that at least one resource operator comprises the step of communicating with the central part (14) an ability to provide the mobile resource equipment.
    [3]
    3. Method, according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that it also comprises the central part (14) communicating periodic updates of the estimated arrival time to the incident manager.
    [4]
    4. Method, according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that it also comprises running an application on a device on the resource operator that communicates with a computer system through the central part (14).
    [5]
    5. Method according to claim 1, characterized
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/39/2019, p. 38/93
    3/5 because the optically readable code is a unique identifier.
    [6]
    6. Method, according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the optically readable code is a bar code.
    [7]
    7. Method, according to claim 1, characterized by the fact that the optically readable code is a quick response code (QR)
    [8]
    8. A central part method (14) directing mobile resource equipment, which is not a two-way communication device, to an emergency site after being notified by an incident manager of a need on the emergency site for the equipment mobile resource, the method characterized by the fact that it comprises:
    (a) the central part (14) obtains the location of the emergency site and locations of a plurality of resource operators, and the central part (14) identifies at least one resource operator based, at least in part, on a comparison of the locations of the said plurality of resource operators in relation to the location of the emergency site;
    (b) the central part (14) communicates with a portable communication device, said at least one resource operator carries with it;
    (c) after the central part (14) has communicated with the portable communication device, then said at least one resource operator confirming that the mobile resource equipment is in proximity to said resource operator based, at least on partly, at the resource operator step, placing the portable communication device close enough to the mobile resource equipment for the portable communication device to detect a unique identifier attached to the mobile resource equipment;
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 39/43
    4/5 (d) after at least one resource operator confirms that the mobile resource equipment is in proximity to said at least one resource operator, then the portable communication device communicates to the central party that the central resource equipment is in proximity to said at least one resource operator based, at least in part, on the detection by the portable communication device of a unique identifier attached to the mobile resource equipment;
    (e) said at least one resource operator to transport mobile resource equipment towards the emergency site; and (f) the central party (14) communicates to the incident manager an estimated time of arrival at the emergency site of said at least one resource operator, and the mobile resource equipment based, at least in part, on the tracking of the movement of said portable communication device towards the emergency site.
    [9]
    9. Method according to claim 8, characterized in that the step of confirming further comprises positioning the portable communication device in close proximity close enough to emit a signal towards, and receive a response signal from the unique identifier , which is a radio frequency identification (RFID) device.
    [10]
    10. Method according to claim 8, characterized by the fact that the unique identifier is an optically readable code.
    [11]
    11. Method, according to claim 10, characterized by the fact that the optically readable code is a barcode.
    [12]
    12. Method, according to claim 10, characterized by the fact that the optically readable code is a rapid response code (QR).
    Petition 87019011069S, of 10/29/2019, p. 40/43
    5/5
    [13]
    13. Method according to claim 8, characterized by the fact that it still comprises the step of said at least one resource operator communicating with the central part (14) a capacity to supply the mobile resource equipment.
    [14]
    14. Method, according to claim 8, characterized by the fact that it also comprises the stage in which the central part (14) communicates periodic updates of the estimated arrival time to the incident manager.
    [15]
    15. Method, according to claim 8, characterized by the fact that it also comprises running an application on a device on the resource operator that communicates with a computer system operated by the central part (14).
    [16]
    16. Method, according to claim 8, characterized by the fact that it still comprises forming a management agreement between public and private entities to provide emergency response services.
    类似技术:
    公开号 | 公开日 | 专利标题
    BR112014001234B1|2020-03-31|METHOD FOR A CENTRAL PART TO DIRECT MOBILE RESOURCE EQUIPMENT
    WO2019085846A1|2019-05-09|Planning method for express lane and unit
    US7395151B2|2008-07-01|System and method for knowledge-based emergency response
    US20050267651A1|2005-12-01|System and method for knowledge-based emergency response
    JP2008539427A|2008-11-13|Advanced land transport management
    CN201707791U|2011-01-12|Intelligent positioning and dispatching system
    CN110930747B|2021-11-19|Intelligent internet traffic service system based on cloud computing technology
    Sungur et al.2015|Smart bus station-passenger information system
    US9143915B2|2015-09-22|Funding of resource tracking and communication system
    Noei et al.2014|Reducing traffic congestion using geo-fence technology: application for emergency car
    Finley et al.2016|Conceptual design of a connected vehicle wrong-way driving detection and management system
    KR102261015B1|2021-06-10|System for generating automatic allocation and automatic bus route using various information collecting fuction
    KR101752978B1|2017-07-03|Incident management system and controlling method thereof
    Zimmerman et al.2007|Using highways for no-notice evacuations: routes to effective evacuation planning primer series.
    WO2016207467A1|2016-12-29|Road and public safety control system
    CN104916130A|2015-09-16|Method for vehicle data sharing and local alarm handling thereof
    EP3962128A1|2022-03-02|Data network for controlling and speeding up an emergency response
    DeBlasio2003|Effects of catastrophic events on transportation system management and operations
    Valentine et al.2017|Sharing Data between Mobile Devices, Connected Vehicles and Infrastructure Task 10: D2X Hub Prototype Acceptance Test Plan and Summary Report.
    Karndacharuka et al.2017|Improving Road Safety through Integrated Process for Incident Traffic Management
    Brooke2004|Sharing Information between Public Safety and Transportation Agencies for Traffic Incident Management
    Sullivan et al.2016|Optimizing EMS Through Intelligent Transportation System | Technologies
    Lassche et al.0|Lessons from Washington
    Hempel2013|An evaluation of a potential deployment of the Integrated Incident Management System | in western New York
    Borland2016|The Effect of Mapping Technology on Fire-Based EMS Response Times in Santa Clara County
    同族专利:
    公开号 | 公开日
    CA2842297C|2017-12-12|
    CA2842297A1|2013-01-24|
    EP2734961A4|2015-03-25|
    MX2014000737A|2016-05-10|
    EP2734961A1|2014-05-28|
    US20130023229A1|2013-01-24|
    US8526910B2|2013-09-03|
    MX352418B|2017-11-23|
    BR112014001234A2|2017-02-14|
    WO2013012916A1|2013-01-24|
    引用文献:
    公开号 | 申请日 | 公开日 | 申请人 | 专利标题
    US5960337A|1994-09-01|1999-09-28|Trimble Navigation Limited|Method for responding to an emergency event|
    US6701156B2|2000-12-19|2004-03-02|Lucent Technologies Inc|System and method for managing response to a need at a site|
    US7091852B2|2002-07-02|2006-08-15|Tri-Sentinel, Inc.|Emergency response personnel automated accountability system|
    US7248159B2|2003-03-01|2007-07-24|User-Centric Ip, Lp|User-centric event reporting|
    US7098787B2|2003-05-29|2006-08-29|Intel Corporation|System and method for signaling emergency responses|
    US7177623B2|2003-07-02|2007-02-13|The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Army|Localized cellular awareness and tracking of emergencies|
    US7221928B2|2003-10-01|2007-05-22|Laird Mark D|Mobile emergency notification system|
    US7404520B2|2004-04-28|2008-07-29|Symbol Technologies, Inc.|System and method for providing location information in transaction processing|
    US8159329B1|2007-03-14|2012-04-17|At&T Intellectual Property Ii, L.P.|Location determination and guidance using radio frequency identification|
    US7629884B2|2007-07-20|2009-12-08|Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson |System, device and method of providing location based, emergency and service call and inventory information|
    US20090040051A1|2007-08-09|2009-02-12|Derieux David A|System and Method for Identifying First Responders in a Hazardous Environment|
    US20110039581A1|2009-08-12|2011-02-17|Yigang Cai|Method and apparatus for restricting the use of a mobile telecommunications device by a vehicle's driver|
    US8630820B2|2009-08-24|2014-01-14|Strider, Inc.|Methods and systems for threat assessment, safety management, and monitoring of individuals and groups|
    US20110071880A1|2009-09-23|2011-03-24|Donald Spector|Location-based Emergency Response System and Method|
    US8478229B2|2009-12-17|2013-07-02|Verizon Patent And Licensing Inc.|Method and apparatus for notifying registered devices of an emergency call|
    US8326259B2|2010-11-05|2012-12-04|GM Global Technology Operations LLC|Remote application of vehicle component settings|US8761821B2|2009-07-21|2014-06-24|Katasi Llc|Method and system for controlling a mobile communication device in a moving vehicle|
    US9386447B2|2009-07-21|2016-07-05|Scott Ferrill Tibbitts|Method and system for controlling a mobile communication device|
    US9615213B2|2009-07-21|2017-04-04|Katasi Llc|Method and system for controlling and modifying driving behaviors|
    US9324120B2|2013-06-07|2016-04-26|Emergency University, Inc.|Method and apparatus for emergency response notification|
    US9619767B2|2013-10-18|2017-04-11|Emergency University, Inc.|Method and apparatus for tracking and maintaining emergency equipment|
    US9143915B2|2013-07-31|2015-09-22|James Patrick Messerly|Funding of resource tracking and communication system|
    WO2015021334A2|2013-08-07|2015-02-12|Parallel Wireless, Inc.|Multi-rat node used for search and rescue|
    US9053588B1|2014-03-13|2015-06-09|Allstate Insurance Company|Roadside assistance management|
    US9282430B1|2014-07-30|2016-03-08|Allstate Insurance Company|Roadside assistance service provider assignment system|
    US9903726B2|2014-10-21|2018-02-27|International Business Machines Corporation|Emergency response re-router|
    US10937101B1|2015-09-03|2021-03-02|State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company|Tow and emergency roadside assistance locating and tracking mobile application|
    US10841379B2|2015-09-22|2020-11-17|Veniam, Inc.|Systems and methods for environmental management in a network of moving things|
    CN106600501B|2015-10-15|2021-01-15|中国电力科学研究院|Geological disaster group testing and group prevention method and platform for realizing same|
    CN212352916U|2017-03-15|2021-01-15|卡本有限公司|Integrated additive manufacturing system and parts|
    WO2018237038A1|2017-06-21|2018-12-27|Carbon, Inc.|Method of additive manufacturing|
    WO2019074790A1|2017-10-09|2019-04-18|Carbon, Inc.|Performance optimization in additive manufacturing|
    JP2021500249A|2017-10-23|2021-01-07|カーボン，インコーポレイテッド|Correction of window variability in additive manufacturing|
    US10270899B1|2018-03-06|2019-04-23|Titan Health & Security Technologies, Inc.|Community safety, security, health communication and emergency notification system providing emergency source tracking|
    US11104061B2|2018-05-14|2021-08-31|Carbon, Inc.|Stereolithography apparatus with individually addressable light source arrays|
    WO2020117490A1|2018-12-03|2020-06-11|Carbon, Inc.|Window thermal profile calibration in additive manufacturing|
    WO2020146092A1|2019-01-09|2020-07-16|Carbon, Inc.|Systems and apparatuses for additive manufacturing with process update and lock down|
    法律状态:
    2018-12-11| B06F| Objections, documents and/or translations needed after an examination request according art. 34 industrial property law|
    2019-11-05| B06U| Preliminary requirement: requests with searches performed by other patent offices: suspension of the patent application procedure|
    2019-11-26| B06I| Technical and formal requirements: publication cancelled|Free format text: ANULADA A PUBLICACAO CODIGO 6.21 NA RPI NO 2548 DE 05/11/2019 POR TER SIDO INDEVIDA. |
    2020-02-04| B09A| Decision: intention to grant|
    2020-03-31| B16A| Patent or certificate of addition of invention granted|Free format text: PRAZO DE VALIDADE: 20 (VINTE) ANOS CONTADOS A PARTIR DE 18/07/2012, OBSERVADAS AS CONDICOES LEGAIS. |
    优先权:
    申请号 | 申请日 | 专利标题
    US201161508761P| true| 2011-07-18|2011-07-18|
    US61/508,761|2011-07-18|
    PCT/US2012/047187|WO2013012916A1|2011-07-18|2012-07-18|Resource tracking and communication system|
    [返回顶部]